<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chris Webb&#039;s Publishing Blog &#187; spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ckwebb.com/tag/spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ckwebb.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 03:06:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Twitter Users Missing the Point with Automated Follow Responses</title>
		<link>http://ckwebb.com/social-networks-and-media/twitter-users-missing-the-point-with-automated-follow-responses/</link>
		<comments>http://ckwebb.com/social-networks-and-media/twitter-users-missing-the-point-with-automated-follow-responses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 01:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Networks and Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ckwebb.com/?p=435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Like many of you, I use Twitter. (@chriswebb) I use it for a variety of reasons, both personal and professional but have always thought of it as a very &#8216;personal&#8217; tool. By that I mean it’s an ecosystem of *people* that despite the distance and in some cases, anonymity, relate to each other. It is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 5px;" title="Twitter Fail Whale" src="http://ckwebb.com/images/fail_whale.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Like many of you, I use Twitter. (<a href="http://twitter.com/chriswebb">@chriswebb)</a> I use it for a variety of reasons, both personal and professional but have always thought of it as a very &#8216;personal&#8217; tool.<span> </span>By that I mean it’s an ecosystem of *people* that despite the distance and in some cases, anonymity, relate to each other.<span> </span>It is a social tool &#8211; I mean it is called &#8220;social media&#8221; for a reason.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">But I am seeing a trend among several users who are opting for an automated response to everyone who follows them.<span> </span>For example, today I got the following warm-hearted response from someone I followed:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&#8220;Thanks for following me! Find GREAT Real Estate deals w/my E-Book (link omitted)&#8221;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Wow, how&#8230;personal.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">So, do I respond personally to everyone who follows me on Twitter?<span> </span>No.<span> </span>But I also don’t send some impersonal canned response either.<span> </span>Instead, I&#8217;ll choose to actually engage you in conversation at some point using the tool.<span> </span>That&#8217;s the point, isn&#8217;t it? Just using Twitter and other tools like it as just another channel to send the same spammy messages one might use in other media is completely missing the point.<span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The same goes for Authors who use social tools as part of their personal platforms to help support their books.<span> </span>I encourage you to use tools like Twitter &#8211; in fact it is becoming more important that you do just that. But use the tools in the way they were meant to be used.<span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Why not just tweet a simple welcome to new followers?  Maybe 5 or so at a time?  At least then people know you are actually doing it and not relegating it to some cold, automated script. If you can&#8217;t manage that for some reason, then just skip it.  I&#8217;d rather see nothing than an autoreply.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Do you use an automated, canned response for your Twitter followers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ckwebb.com/social-networks-and-media/twitter-users-missing-the-point-with-automated-follow-responses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Bacn for Me, Please.  Thanks.</title>
		<link>http://ckwebb.com/technology-and-internet/no-bacn-for-me-please-thanks/</link>
		<comments>http://ckwebb.com/technology-and-internet/no-bacn-for-me-please-thanks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 20:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ckwebb.com/technology/no-bacn-for-me-please-thanks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m with Mike Gunderloy on this one.
Bacn?  Seriously?
I first saw the term earlier today when I read a Tweet from Chris Brogan and it seems to be growing like a virus.  See?  It has already spread to this blog!
This is meme run amok.  We don&#8217;t need a new word for email [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.ckwebb.com/images/bacon.jpg" class="right" align="right" border="0" height="163" hspace="10" vspace="10" width="250" />I&#8217;m with Mike Gunderloy <a href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/08/20/words-we-dont-need-bacn/">on this one.</a></p>
<p>Bacn?  Seriously?</p>
<p>I first saw the term earlier today when I read a Tweet from <a href="http://grasshopperfactory.com/cbc/bacn-a-new-internet-term/">Chris Brogan</a> and it seems to be growing like a virus.  See?  It has already spread to this blog!</p>
<p>This is meme run amok.  We don&#8217;t need a new word for email that&#8217;s sort of important.  It&#8217;s not quite spam, but not something I can just delete right now &#8211; it&#8217;s Bacn?</p>
<p>Come on.  This is not serious is it?  Really?</p>
<p>Moving on&#8230;</p>
<p>Photo credit, <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/lucid_nightmare/">Lucid_Nightmare </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ckwebb.com/technology-and-internet/no-bacn-for-me-please-thanks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

